Systems integration & APIs
Systems integration that keeps operational truth intact.
Flatorb connects physical workflow, cloud applications and enterprise systems through controlled APIs, EDI, files and event flows—so data arrives with meaning, validation and accountable recovery.
Workflow-led engineeringRemote-first, on-site when needed
Operational purpose
Integration succeeds when systems agree about the event—not only the fields.
Moving data is the easy part. Dependable integration needs ownership, timing, identity, validation, duplicate handling, error recovery and operational visibility.
Flatorb works from the physical event and business record outward, designing integration boundaries that support real users, devices and workflows without hiding failed transactions.
One system owns a meaningful change.
A receipt, movement, asset handover, job completion, approval or status change is defined with clear authority.
The event is mapped and validated.
Interfaces transform data, protect sequence and identity, handle duplicates and record processing evidence.
The connected system updates predictably.
Success, rejection and retry remain visible so users know whether the wider business record is dependable.
Engineering capabilities
Design integration for business continuity and supportability.
A dependable interface has a clear contract, security model, monitoring path and recovery owner. Flatorb connects technology with the people who operate it.
API design and integration
Connect modern systems through authenticated REST or other supported application interfaces and governed event contracts.
- REST
- Webhooks
- Authentication
EDI and partner exchange
Support agreed logistics, customer or supplier messages with mapping, validation and acknowledgement.
- EDI
- Partners
- Acknowledgement
File and batch interfaces
Implement dependable scheduled or event-driven file exchange where APIs are unavailable or unnecessary.
- CSV / XML
- SFTP
- Schedules
Master data synchronization
Control product, asset, customer, location, user and reference data needed for consistent transactions.
- Identity
- Ownership
- Change
Error handling and observability
Expose failed records, reason, retry and resolution so integration does not become a silent data gap.
- Logs
- Retries
- Queues
Phased migration and cutover
Plan coexistence, reconciliation, testing and rollback when replacing or introducing connected systems.
- Testing
- Reconcile
- Cutover
Where it creates value
Integrate where trusted events must cross a system boundary.
The business case is strongest when users re-enter data, records disagree, status is late or one operational event must serve multiple systems.
Operational software to ERP
Exchange orders, items, receipts, movements, consumption, completion and inventory evidence with the system of record.
Track: re-entry, posting delay and reconciliation.WMS, 3PL and customer integration
Connect inbound, fulfilment, stock, shipment, status and billing events across service providers and customers.
Track: status calls, disputes and failed messages.Asset, maintenance and finance
Synchronize asset identity, custody, work, parts, cost and lifecycle events across specialized systems.
Track: duplicate records, missing cost and stale status.Container, transport and EDI flows
Exchange gate, movement, status, repair and logistics messages with partners and enterprise platforms.
Track: manual entry, rejection and turnaround.Identity and workforce context
Connect users, roles, organizational units or attendance context to controlled operational permissions and tasks.
Track: provisioning delay and authorization errors.Reporting and business intelligence
Deliver governed operational events and reference data to analytics without forcing reports to reconstruct truth.
Track: data latency, unexplained variance and preparation effort.Fit before feature
Define authority, timing and recovery before choosing the interface.
Integration architecture should reflect which system owns each record, when the destination must know, what happens during outage and who resolves exceptions.
Test the fit for your operation ↗Master and transaction ownership prevents circular updates, duplicate authority and unclear correction paths.
Latency should match the operating consequence. Real-time adds complexity when a reliable batch is sufficient.
Idempotency, sequence, acknowledgement, retry and reconciliation rules protect records during normal failure.
Support teams need usable alerts, source evidence, reason, ownership and a controlled replay or correction path.
Connected architecture
Create an integration layer that users can trust and support.
Flatorb connects applications and devices through explicit event contracts, validation, monitoring and recovery rather than unmanaged point-to-point transfers.
International implementation
Integration adapted to local platforms, tax models and regulatory exchange.
Enterprise platforms, e-invoicing, tax structures, customer EDI, languages, hosting requirements and data policies differ by country. Flatorb maps those requirements into a supportable integration design and can deliver workshops remotely or on site.
Support country-specific taxes, invoice structures, references and required transaction data without assuming one universal model.
Map local ERP, bank, customer, supplier or regulator interfaces and their operating constraints.
Align authentication, transfer, access, retention and hosting with customer and market requirements.
Coordinate business and technical owners online, with on-site process discovery where useful.
Frequently asked questions
Questions teams ask about Systems Integration.
Clear answers for early evaluation, business cases and implementation planning.
01What types of systems can Flatorb integrate?+
Flatorb can connect operational software, ERP, WMS, asset, maintenance, manufacturing, finance, HR, CRM, customer, supplier, device and reporting platforms where suitable interfaces are available.
02Do all integrations need APIs?+
No. APIs are often preferred for timely structured exchange, but EDI, webhooks, databases, message services or controlled files may be appropriate depending on system capability and business need.
03What happens when an integration fails?+
A dependable design records status and reason, alerts the appropriate owner, supports controlled retry or correction and provides reconciliation evidence.
04Can Flatorb work with legacy systems?+
Often yes. The approach may use available files, database views, middleware or vendor interfaces while protecting the legacy system and planning realistic support.
05How are integrations secured?+
Controls may include authenticated endpoints, encryption, network restrictions, key or certificate management, least-privilege permissions, audit logging and monitored failure.
06Can integration support country-specific tax models?+
Yes. Data mapping and business rules can represent multiple taxes, exemptions, currencies and document requirements, subject to the customer defining and validating the applicable rules.
Start with one real workflow
Show us the event that must cross a system boundary without losing meaning.
We will help define ownership, interface, mapping, validation, security, recovery, reconciliation and a practical test between systems.
- What must be identified, sensed or connected?
- Where does the current record become late or unreliable?
- Which users and systems depend on the event?
- What measurable outcome would justify action?