Container depot and yard operations
Control every container event from gate activity to repair and billing.
Flatorb connects container identity, yard location, condition, survey, approvals, workshop activity, EDI and commercial evidence—creating one operational history across the depot.
Workflow-led engineeringSoftware, devices and integration
Industry operating model
A container’s commercial record begins with physical events in the yard.
When gate, location, survey, repair and release activity lives in separate notes or spreadsheets, service, EDI and billing records become late and difficult to defend.
Flatorb creates a continuous operational history from arrival to release. Mobile users capture evidence where work happens while planners, customer teams and management see current position, responsibility, exceptions and readiness.
The unit enters with identity and interchange context.
Container, vehicle, party, time, condition and documents establish the operating record.
Location, survey, estimate, approval and work remain connected.
Moves and status changes preserve responsibility and evidence through the depot flow.
Completed operations support EDI, customer and billing outputs.
Gate-out validation and charge inputs are derived from the same governed history.
Priority workflows
Replace disconnected yard records with one controlled container narrative.
The platform must work at the gate, in the yard, during survey and inside repair operations while maintaining one identity and status model.
Gate-in and gate-out control
Capture container, vehicle, driver, party, condition, documents and release authority.
- Interchange
- Release
- Timestamp
Yard location and movement
Maintain block, row, stack, slot or configured location through deliberate moves.
- Location
- Move
- Search
Survey and damage evidence
Record condition, component, damage, repair code, measurement, photo and responsibility context.
- Survey
- Photo
- Damage code
Estimate and approval workflow
Route repair estimates, revisions, approvals, holds and customer decisions with history.
- Estimate
- Approval
- Hold
Workshop execution
Trace repair tasks, labour, material, completion and readiness against the container record.
- M&R
- Work order
- Completion
EDI, customer and billing outputs
Generate governed status, movement and charge evidence from completed operations.
- EDI
- Portal
- Billing input
Relevant Flatorb solutions
Connect gate, yard, survey, repair and commercial evidence.
Flatorb combines mobile execution, yard visibility, structured repair control and system interfaces in one configurable container workflow.
Container Yard Management System
Control container movements, condition, approvals, repair and release.
The core solution for depot and yard operations. ↗Asset Management System
Manage yard equipment, workshop tools, maintenance and inspections.
For supporting operational asset control. ↗GPS & Location
Connect vehicles, mobile equipment and selected outdoor movement evidence.
For wider mobile and location context. ↗Systems Integration
Exchange EDI, customer status, finance and enterprise information.
For dependable external and commercial records. ↗Connected architecture
Create commercial and customer outputs from the same events used to run the yard.
Container, MLO, customer and authorization context enters the operation. Flatorb governs the physical flow and produces validated status, evidence and charge inputs for connected systems.
Technology fit
Engineer mobile capture and location around the physical yard.
Barcode, OCR, mobile devices, photos, GPS and integration can each support different control points. Selection depends on container identity, outdoor conditions, network reliability and required proof.
Barcode & QR
Identify documents, jobs, locations, parts and controlled workshop events.
Explore technology ↗02GPS & Location
Connect selected vehicle, equipment, arrival, departure and dwell evidence.
Explore technology ↗03AI-Enabled Automation
Assist controlled extraction or image review where data and tolerances support it.
Explore technology ↗04Systems Integration
Connect EDI, customer, MLO, finance and analytics platforms.
Explore technology ↗Implementation approach
Prove the full gate-to-release chain with real yard exceptions.
Flatorb maps actual traffic, survey, approval, repair, location and billing practices, then pilots the complete history with representative container conditions and customer rules.
Observe gate, moves, survey, workshop, planning and customer information flow.
Align locations, condition, repair, approval and release states.
Test devices, network, photos and workflows under real outdoor conditions.
Verify messages, reports and billing inputs against completed operational events.
Frequently asked questions
Questions teams ask about Container Depots & Yards.
Clear answers for early evaluation, internal discussion and implementation planning.
01What container yard workflows can Flatorb support?+
Gate-in, gate-out, location, movement, survey, damage, estimate, approval, repair, hold, release, EDI and billing-support workflows can be configured according to the depot model.
02Can the system show a container’s current yard location?+
Yes. Configured yard locations and movement confirmations can maintain current position and location history.
03Can survey photos and damage codes be retained?+
Yes. Structured survey information, photos, notes, timestamps and responsibility can remain linked to the container and repair history.
04Can Flatorb exchange EDI messages?+
Yes. EDI or other interfaces can exchange agreed movement, status, customer and commercial information.
05Does the system support repair estimates and approvals?+
Estimate lines, revisions, approvals, holds, work execution and completion evidence can be configured within the container workflow.
Start with one real operating gap
Show us where the container’s yard history stops matching the customer or billing record.
We will map the gate, location, survey, repair, EDI and commercial events needed to create one dependable flow.
- What moves, changes state or requires proof?
- Where does the current record become late or unreliable?
- Which users, customers and systems depend on it?
- What measurable outcome would justify action?